A Story of Numbers Class 8 Solutions Ganita Prakash Maths Chapter 3

A Story of Numbers Class 8 Solutions Ganita Prakash Maths Chapter 3

NCERT Solutions for Class 8 Maths Chapter 3 – A Story of Numbers (2025–26 Edition)

Explore the fascinating journey of numbers with our expertly crafted NCERT Solutions for Class 8 Maths Chapter 3 Ganita Prakash – A Story of Numbers. Aligned with the latest CBSE syllabus for the 2025–26 academic session, these solutions offer clear, step-by-step explanations that decode ancient number systems and cultural counting methods.

🔢 Key Concepts Covered:

  • Evolution of number systems across civilizations
  • Understanding base systems and place value
  • Roman and Egyptian numerals explained
  • Comparative reasoning across historical contexts

🧠 Why These Solutions Matter: Designed to spark mathematical curiosity, this chapter blends historical insights with logical reasoning. Through engaging activities and structured examples, students build a strong foundation in number sense and analytical thinking.

📘 Perfect for:

  • CBSE Class 8 students seeking clarity and conceptual depth
  • Teachers and parents supporting exam-readiness
  • Learners curious about the origins and evolution of mathematics

NCERT In-Text Question Page 54

Reema’s Curiosity

Figure it Out

Here is a practical way to operate using sticks only (no Hindu numerals or number names), like in Method 1.


➕ Addition (joining collections)

Idea: Combine and regroup.

Method

  1. Put both collections of sticks together in one place.
  2. Whenever you have a full bundle equal to one higher unit (e.g., ten loose sticks), tie them into one bundle.
  3. Continue regrouping until no more full bundles can be made.
  4. The remaining bundles and loose sticks show the result.

➖ Subtraction (taking away)

Idea: Remove sticks.

Method

  1. Start with the larger collection.
  2. Remove sticks matching the second collection.
  3. If you need more loose sticks, untie one higher bundle into smaller sticks.
  4. After removing all required sticks, what remains is the answer.

✖️ Multiplication (equal groups)

Idea: Repeat one collection several times.

Method

  1. Make as many identical copies of one collection as indicated by the other collection.
  2. Combine all copies into one pile.
  3. Regroup into bundles where possible.
  4. The final bundles and loose sticks give the product.

➗ Division (sharing equally)

Idea: Distribute fairly.

Method

  1. Take the full collection of sticks.
  2. Share them one by one into equal groups.
  3. If needed, untie bundles into smaller sticks to continue sharing.
  4. When no more equal sharing is possible:
    • sticks in each group show the quotient
    • leftover sticks (if any) are the remainder.

✅ This stick-based method works because bundling and unbundling naturally mimic place value and arithmetic operations without needing written numerals.

Below is one clear way to extend Method 2 so that multi-letter strings represent all quantities.
Assume the letters are ordered: a, b, c, …, z.

📊 Table 1: Single-letter representations (up to 26)

Assume ordered letters: a, b, c, …, z

OrderSymbol
1a
2b
3c
4d
5e
24x
25y
26z

📊 Table 2: Two-letter representations (starting after 26)
OrderSymbol
27aa
28ab
29ac
30ad
51ay
52az
53ba
54bb

📊 Table 3: Three-letter representations (after all two-letter strings)
OrderSymbol
After zzaaa
Nextaab
Nextaac
Nextaad

Pattern:
1-letter → 2-letter → 3-letter → continues without limit.

NCERT In-Text Question Page 59

3.2 Some Early Number Systems

Figure it Out

(i) 1222   
(ii) 2999   
(iii) 302   
(iv) 715

NCERT In-Text Question Page (60-61)

Figure it Out

They likely use different number-name sequences because their counting system is object-specific, designed to match how items are grouped in daily life.

First, many Pacific cultures traditionally count some objects in natural bundles (like pairs of coconuts, sets of fish, or bundles of yams). Using different sequences makes counting faster and more meaningful for trade and sharing.

Second, it reduces mistakes. When each type of object has its own counting words, listeners immediately know what is being counted and in what grouping.

Third, it reflects practical needs. Communities that depend heavily on fishing, farming, or trading often develop specialised counting systems suited to those activities.

Fourth, such systems can encode cultural knowledge and traditions, not just mathematics.

If they used only one universal sequence, they would have to repeatedly convert between bundles and single items, which would be slower and less intuitive for their everyday work.

So, these multiple sequences are an efficient, context-based adaptation to their environment and way of life.

(i) (ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-urapon) + (ukasar-ukasarukasar-urapon)
(ii) (ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-urapon) – (ukasar-ukasarukasar)
(iii) (ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-urapon) × (ukasar-ukasar)
(iv) (ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar) ÷ (ukasar-ukasar)

Using the extended counting-by-2 system:

  • ukasar = one
  • urapon = two
  • ukasar-ukasar = urapon

(i) (ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-urapon) + (ukasar-ukasarukasar-urapon)

(ukasar-ukasar)-(ukasar-ukasar)-urapon-(ukasar-ukasar)-ukasar-urapon

urapon-urapon-urapon-urapon-urapon-ukasar

(ii) (ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-urapon) – (ukasar-ukasar-ukasar)

(ukasarukasarukasar-ukasar-urapon) – (ukasarukasarukasar)

ukasar-urapon

(iii) (ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-ukasar-urapon) × (ukasar-ukasar)

The Hindu–Arabic number system is far more efficient than the Roman system because of several key features:

1. Place value system
In the Hindu system, the position of a digit determines its value (e.g., 2 in 205). Roman numerals have no true place value, making large numbers harder to manage.

2. Presence of zero (0)
Zero acts both as a number and a placeholder. Roman numerals have no zero, which makes writing and calculating with large numbers difficult.

3. Small set of symbols
The Hindu system uses only ten digits (0–9) to write any number. Roman numerals require many different symbols and long repetitions.

4. Compact representation
Large numbers are written briefly (e.g., 10,000 vs very long Roman forms). Roman numerals quickly become lengthy and cumbersome.

5. Ease of arithmetic operations
Addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are straightforward using the Hindu system’s column methods. Roman numerals are very inconvenient for calculations.

6. Supports advanced mathematics
The Hindu system makes algebra, decimals, and modern computation possible. Roman numerals are mainly suitable only for simple counting and labeling.

7. Scalability
The Hindu place-value system can represent extremely large numbers easily, while Roman numerals become impractical.

✅ Because of place value and zero, the Hindu number system is powerful, compact, and calculation-friendly.

Try it Yourself.

3.3 The Idea of a Base

Figure it Out

NCERT In-Text Page 63

Yes. Zero (0) cannot be represented in our base-5 system as there is no symbol for it.

70 = 1, 71 = 7, 72 = 49, 73 = 343, 74 = 2401

Hence, 1, 7, 49, 343, 2401 are landmark numbers of base 7.
The landmark numbers of a base-n number system are the powers of n starting from
n0 = 1, n, n2, n3,…

NCERT In-Text Question Page 65

Figure it Out

NCERT In-Text Question Page 66-68

How to multiply two numbers in Egyptian numerals? Let us first consider the product of two landmark numbers.

Each landmark number is a power of 10 and so multiplying it with 10 increases the power by 1, which is the next landmark number.

Thus, the product of any two landmark numbers is another landmark
number!

NCERT In-Text Question Page 69-70

Figure it Out

No, there cannot be a number in the Egyptian numeral system where any single symbol appears 10 or more times.

Why?

The Egyptian number system is an additive, base-10 system with a key rule:

👉 Each symbol can be repeated at most 9 times.

When a symbol would need to appear 10 times, Egyptians replaced those ten symbols with one symbol of the next higher value.

Example

  • Instead of writing ten symbols for 1
    (𓏺𓏺𓏺𓏺𓏺𓏺𓏺𓏺𓏺𓏺)
    they wrote one symbol for 10.
  • Instead of ten symbols for 10, they wrote one symbol for 100.

Reason

This keeps the numeral representation:

  • shorter
  • more organized
  • easy to read

So, by the rules of the Egyptian system, no symbol ever appears 10 or more times in a standard representation.

NCERT In-Text Question Page 73

(i) 63 
(ii) 132
(iii) 200
(iv) 60
(v) 3605

NCERT In-Text Question Page 80

Figure it Out

  1. Hindu numerals and 0 are used daily in money, time, measurements, and phone numbers.
  2. Every digital payment, bill, and price depends on this number system.
  3. In schools, students use it for arithmetic, algebra, and geometry.
  4. Scientists and engineers rely on it for calculations and formulas.
  5. Doctors use it for medicine dosages and medical reports.
  6. Businesses and banks need it for accounting and financial transactions.
  7. Computers work on binary (0 and 1), so modern technology depends on zero.
  8. Zero is vital as a placeholder (like in 205) and as a number itself.
  9. Without this system, calculations would be slow and confusing (like Roman numerals).
  10. Our scientific, technological, and economic progress would be far behind today.
🔢 Comparison: Roman Numerals vs Hindu–Arabic Numerals
FeatureHindu–Arabic NumeralsRoman Numerals
Symbols0–9 (ten digits)I, V, X, L, C, D, M
Place valueYes (position matters)No place value
ZeroHas 0No zero
Large numbersEasy to writeLong and complex
ArithmeticEasy to calculateDifficult to calculate

✏️ Examples

1. Writing numbers

  • Hindu: 205
  • Roman: CCV (no zero needed, but place value missing)

2. Addition (48 + 27)

  • Hindu:
    48 + 27 = 75 (quick column method)
  • Roman:
    XLVIII + XXVII → needs conversion → LXXV (cumbersome)

3. Multiplication (12 × 8)

  • Hindu:
    12 × 8 = 96 (straightforward)
  • Roman:
    XII × VIII → must convert to decimal first → XCVI

✅ Conclusion

The Hindu–Arabic system with zero is far more efficient and made modern mathematics, science, and computing possible, while Roman numerals are mainly useful today for numbering (like clocks or chapters).

🌟 If humans had fewer fingers…

The Hindu–Arabic numeral system we use today is base-10 (decimal) mainly because counting with ten fingers is convenient.

  • If we had 8 fingers, our place-value system would likely be base-8 (octal).
  • With 5 fingers, probably base-5.
  • With 2 fingers, we would naturally use base-2 (binary).
🔢 What would the numerals look like?

The shapes of symbols might have evolved differently, but the key idea is:

  • In base-10, digits are 0–9
  • In base-8, digits would be 0–7
  • In base-5, digits would be 0–4
  • In base-2, digits are 0 and 1

Now let’s convert the number 25 (base-10).


✅ Convert 25 to base-8

Divide by 8:

  • 25 ÷ 8 = 3 remainder 1
  • 3 ÷ 8 = 0 remainder 3

Read upward → 31₈

✔️ 25₁₀ = 31₈


✅ Convert 25 to base-5

Divide by 5:

  • 25 ÷ 5 = 5 remainder 0
  • 5 ÷ 5 = 1 remainder 0
  • 1 ÷ 5 = 0 remainder 1

Read upward → 100₅

✔️ 25₁₀ = 100₅


✅ Convert 25 to base-2 (binary)

Divide by 2:

  • 25 ÷ 2 = 12 remainer 1
  • 12 ÷ 2 = 6 remainer 0
  • 6 ÷ 2 = 3 remainer 0
  • 3 ÷ 2 = 1 remainer 1
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 remainer 1

Read upward → 11001₂

✔️ 25₁₀ = 11001₂


🧠 Summary
BaseRepresentation of 25
Base-1025
Base-831
Base-5100
Base-211001

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *